PL EN
RESEARCH PAPER
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence of car accidents with cloven-hoofed game over a 5-year period in the Košice region. The highest number of accidents occurred on 1st class roads (11.18%), which are the shortest and most frequently occurring roads in Slovakia. There were a total of 4.1 animals/km found on such roads within the Košice region. Accidents occurred most frequently during April, October and November; with roe deer being the most commonly affected (62.12%). The roadkill numbers for red deer (21.59%) and wild boar (16.29%) were highest during October and November. These road traffic accidents were mostly related to the migration of game, especially during the rutting season. The time of the collision for each game species was also recorded. It was found that the majority of collisions involving roe deer occurred between 05.00–06.00 and 18.00–21.00, the collisions with red deer occurred most commonly between 21.00–22.00,and collisions involving wild boars occurred between 20–23.00. Over the 24-hour period studied (day, night, dusk and dawn), it was found that from the traffic collisions during the day, roe deer constituted the highest number of roadkill (28.35%). However, during the night, incidents involving wild boar were most frequent (84.88%). The number of car accidents involving cloven-hoofed game was the least frequent during dusk (6.25%), followed by dawn (11.37%) over the 24-hour period.
REFERENCES (20)
1.
Beben D. Crossings Construction as a Method of Animal Conservation. Transp Res Rec. 2016; 14: 474–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpr....
 
2.
Herz J. Transportation and Game [in Czech]. In Myslivost. ISSN 0323-214X 46887. 2014; 62: 40.
 
3.
Steiner W, Schöll EM, Leisch F, et al. Temporal patterns of roe deer traffic accidents: Effects of season, daytime and lunar phase. PLoS ONE. 2021; 16(3): e0249082. https://doi.org/10.1371/journa....
 
4.
Olson DD, Bissonette JA, Cramerr PC, et al. How does variation in winter weather affect deer-vehicle collision rates? Wildl Biol. 2015; 21: 80–87. https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00....
 
5.
Tajchman K, Gawryluk A, Drozd L, et al. Deer-vehicle collisions in Lubelskie region in Poland. Safety coefficients. Appl Ecol Env Res. 2017; 15(3): 1485–1488. http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aee....
 
6.
Keten, A. Distribution and habitat preference of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) in Düzce province of Turkey. JFFIU. 2017; 67(1): 22–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.17099/jff....
 
7.
Červený J, Šťastný K. Hunting Zoology. [In Czech]. Vyd Druckvo, spol.s.r.o. Praha; 2015 ISBN 978-80-87668-14-6.
 
8.
Schwartz ALW, Shilling FM, Perkins SE. The value of monitoring wildlife roadkill. Eur J Wildl Res. 2020; 66(18). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344....
 
9.
Hothorn T, Müller J, Held L, et al. Temporal Patterns of Deer-vehicle Collisions Consistent with Deer Activity Pattern and Density Increase but not General Accident Risk. Accid Anal Prev. 2015; 81: 143–152. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.037.
 
10.
Kitowski I, Łętowski J, Kępowicz M. Frequency, phenology and ecological factors in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus Linnaeus, 1758) – vehicle collisions in the Lublin County (East Poland) in the light of the police data. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska Lublin – Polonia. 2014; XXXII(1): 9–17.
 
11.
Little AR, Demarais S, Gee KL, et al. Does human predation risk affect harvest susceptibility of white-tailed deer during hunting season? Wildl Soc Bull. 2014; 38: 797–805. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.44....
 
12.
Pagon N, Grignolio S, Brivio F, et al. Territorial behaviour of male roe deer: a telemetry study of spatial behaviour and activity levels. Folia zool. 2017; 66(4): 267–276. https://doi.org/10.25225/fozo.....
 
13.
Allwin B, Gokarn NS, Vedamanickam S, et al. The wild pig (Sus Scrofa) behavior- a retrospective study. J Dairy Vet Anim Res. 2016; 3(3): 115–125. doi: 10.15406/jdvar.2016.03.00083.
 
14.
Vajas P, Calenge C, Richard E, et al. Many, large and early: Hunting pressure on wild boar relates to simple metrics of hunting effort. Sci Total Environ. 2020; 698: 134251. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134251.
 
15.
ACT No. 274/2009 Coll. On Hunting [In Slovak].
 
16.
Bíl M, Kubeček J, Sedoník J, et al. A system for evidence of animal vehicle collisions along transportation networks. Biol Conserv. 2017; 213: 167–174. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.07.012.
 
17.
Gren I-M, Jägerbrand A. Calculating the costs of animal-vehicle accidents involving ungulate in Sweden. Transp Res D Transp Environ. 2019; 70: 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.....
 
18.
Neumann W, Ericsson G, Dettki H, Bunnefeld N, Keuler NS, Helmers DP, Radeloff VC. Difference in spatiotemporal patterns of wildlife road-crossings and wildlife-vehicle collisions. Biol Conserv. 2012; 145: 70–78. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.10.011.
 
19.
Morelle K, Lehaire F, Lejeune P. Spatio-temporal patterns of wildlife-vehicle collisions in a region with a high-density road network. Nat Conserv. 2013; 5:53–73, https://doi.org/10.3897/nature....
 
20.
Anonym. Wild animals caused more than 13,000 road accidents in 2019. Online https://www.foreigner.fi/artic... (access:2020.2.14).
 
eISSN:2084-6312
ISSN:1505-7054
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top